Re: windows implementation of CINT and ROOT Classes

From: Valeri Fine (Faine) (fine@bnl.gov)
Date: Wed Jul 28 1999 - 00:10:44 MEST


 Hello, Rene
 I saw this message.
 I'll try to check things today / tomorrow.

 There was another one about TMapFile to be replied.

  With my regards,
                                  Valery

----- Original Message -----
From: Rene Brun <Rene.Brun@cern.ch>
To: <rms@physics.utoledo.edu>
Cc: roottalk discussion group <roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>
Sent: 27 èþëÿ 1999 ã. 11:37
Subject: Re: windows implementation of CINT and ROOT Classes


> Hi Richard,
> This problem seems to be NT/95 specific and is currently under
> investigation.
>
> Rene Brun
>
> richard m schectman wrote:
> >
> > we have developed a series of utility routines to display and analyze
> > atomic spectroscopy and lifetime data from our Low Energy Heavy Ion
> > Accelerator... the macros work fine when called from the CINT command
> > line via the .x command... they do NOT work fine when the .x command is
> > assigned to a Control Bar Button and input from the keyboard is
> > requested by the macro... input from a scanf command in the macro gets
> > garbled in a fashion which is different in WinNT from what it is in
> > Win95: in NT, the first character input gets stripped off and goes into
> > a buffer, where CINT finds it after the macro has finished; in Win95,
> > characters are intermittently and irreproducibly echoed to the keyboard-
> > with the extraneous characters going into a buffer, where they appear
> > after the macro has executed
> >
> > it would make the users' lives much simpler if the macros could be
> > invoked from buttons rather than from the command line, and any
> > suggestions you have would be most welcome... many thanks
> >                                 RM Schectman
> >                                 Professor of Physics
> >                                 University of Toledo
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:36 MET