Hi Andy,
a 'const enum' is just an integer. Why not
...
private:
static const int first_;
};
with an initialization like
const int AClass::first_=AClass::a;
somewhere.
Peter Malzacher
Andy Salnikov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> another problem which I'm not able to solve myself. An example is a
> simple class:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> // AClass.hh
>
> class AClass {
> public:
> enum Enum {
> a = 1,
> b = 2
> } ;
>
> private:
> static const Enum first_ ;
> } ;
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Running rootcint on it gives me a message I cannot understand:
>
> salnikov@percheron [266] rootcint -f AClassDict.cc -c AClass.h
> Note: operator new() masked 1c
> Note: operator delete() masked 1c
> Error: No symbol AClass::first_ in current scope FILE: LINE:0
> Error loading headers...
>
> I tried whatever #pragmas I could imagine only - no difference at all.
> The main problem seems to be with the const-ness of the field
> declaration, it works OK when "first_" is non-const. Do I have any
> chance to compile it as it is, without removing const?
>
> Cheers,
> Andy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:37 MET