Hello, I have found a strange behavior of TF2 member function TF2::Integral(): when I tried to integrate a 2D function(which varied rather rapidly), it only evaluated exactly 18 points and then gave a very rough result. I tried to decrease the epsilon parameter, but still it evaluated only 18 points. There is no such a problem for 1D integration. Do you know what is the reason of the problem and how can I get a much more accurate result using the Integral() member function? Thanks! Cheers, Feng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:39 MET