RE: Pure virtual destructors in abstract classes

From: Nick West (n.west1@physics.oxford.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 20 1999 - 10:53:19 MET


Hi Stefano,

thanks for replying and the education about virtual destructors.  I did not most
of that, but not the bit that the virtual base destructor gets called as well. 
However its the pure part that got me confused.  First I got the problem about
the strange unresolved symbol  __dt__1AXv.  I know about nm with demangling -
what I had not realised was that, by default nm demangles on OSF - I had to ask
to mangle the name to find other examples of __dt__*Xv.  So thanks for that.  I
still would like to know why adding inheritance from TObject convinced CINT that
the concrete subclass was now incomplete.

Cheers,

Nick.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:43 MET