Hello everyone,
We promised another meeting last year but due to several reasons we did
not do it. For the next ones I will follow Federico's suggestion and
book them in advance for the whole year so that we will be forced to
keep up.
OK, now a reminder for the action list from the last meeting:
http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=minutes&materialId=minutes&confId=41169
- Try to figure out the timeline/responsible for re-writing EUSTEP and
possibly come-up with more development requirements (Mohammad).
- status ?
- Notify M.Maire about the issue (un-physical peaks in GEANE low
momentum spectra) so that it can be replaced in the GEANE release.
(Rene) Apply patch from Alessandra to ERTRCH
- I know there was a discussion with M.Maire who agreed with the results
of Alessandra and basically said that the ball is on our side. Any news
if the patch was applied ?
- The idea was to remove assembly volumes from the tree path (Ivana had
to supply an example to Mohammad.
- status ?
Another issue here was the report of Mohammad that assemblies do appear
sometime as current volume in tracking (which should never happen).
- I did a recent development that fixed a related issue for divided
volumes (using the same method to propagate). I suggest to Mohammad to
try again and report back. Anyway I cannot test without a simple example.
- Implement the possibility to configure not having G3 defaults so the
user can use DefineParticle()/SetDecayMode() for defining his own.
- I admit I did not look yet into this. Ivana, is it better on your side
? It is something simple to do but we should actually do it.
- Report from Mohammad that reflections are not handled correctly via
G4root interface.
- I checked with the example provided with G4root in test directory
(propagation of optical photons in a water tank with bubbles - N06).
Reflections *are* taken into account. No example provided yet by Mohammad...
- A particle may end-up outside the setup giving the error message: "No
physical volume found at track vertex: (107635,-190901,-638802)"
- I have fixed this and to my knowledge does not happen again.
- "Proposed step is 0" issue in FLUKA-VMC.
- I have fixed this in TFluka thanks to the fact that I have got the
FLUKA source from Alfredo Ferrari.
To do's:
Responsibles for the items not yet solved, please let me know the
status. For everybody: I will try to book the next meeting at the very
beginning of February and after every 2 months after - let me know if
you are happy with this. Any new items to add to the agenda are welcome.
Best regards,
Andrei
Received on Wed Jan 14 2009 - 08:43:45 CET