Hi all,
I have booked a room for the first meeting this year on 4 February:
http://indico.cern.ch/event/vmc_feb09
Reference for EVO connection given there. I have also booked every 2
months for the rest of the year, under the provision that the dates may
change in case of emergency... :
http://indico.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=3l151
Please let me know if you have new items to put into the agenda.
Regards,
Andrei
P.S. To have a reference of what was discussed last meeting:
http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=41169
Mohammad Al-Turany wrote:
> Hallo everyone,
>
> Just a comment to the first point:
>
>> 1. Try to figure out the timeline/responsible for re-writing EUSTEP and
>> possibly come-up with more development requirements (Mohammad).
>> - status ?
>
> I rewrote the eustep completely in c++ (TGeant3gu), I also had to interface
> some common blocks, modify the Makefile and so on. Any way it is working now
> for me and I can send the changes at anytime to Rene. The only point which
> we may discuss here is that if we should implement in the
> TVirtualMCApplication a new method GeaneStepping and call this from the
> eustep instead of the stepping which is used usually by G3/G4/Fluka, me
> personally I prefer to do this new method! The question is, would it be ok
> to everybody should we discuss this in the meeting or there is no need for
> discussion?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Mohammad
>
>
>
> On 14.01.2009 8:43 Uhr, "Andrei Gheata" <Andrei.Gheata_at_cern.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> We promised another meeting last year but due to several reasons we did
>> not do it. For the next ones I will follow Federico's suggestion and
>> book them in advance for the whole year so that we will be forced to
>> keep up.
>>
>> OK, now a reminder for the action list from the last meeting:
>> http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?resId=minutes&materialId=minutes&confI
>> d=41169
>>
>> 1. Try to figure out the timeline/responsible for re-writing EUSTEP and
>> possibly come-up with more development requirements (Mohammad).
>> - status ?
>>
>> 2. Notify M.Maire about the issue (un-physical peaks in GEANE low
>> momentum spectra) so that it can be replaced in the GEANE release.
>> (Rene) Apply patch from Alessandra to ERTRCH
>> - I know there was a discussion with M.Maire who agreed with the results
>> of Alessandra and basically said that the ball is on our side. Any news
>> if the patch was applied ?
>>
>> 3. The idea was to remove assembly volumes from the tree path (Ivana had
>> to supply an example to Mohammad.
>> - status ?
>> Another issue here was the report of Mohammad that assemblies do appear
>> sometime as current volume in tracking (which should never happen).
>> - I did a recent development that fixed a related issue for divided
>> volumes (using the same method to propagate). I suggest to Mohammad to
>> try again and report back. Anyway I cannot test without a simple example.
>>
>> 4. Implement the possibility to configure not having G3 defaults so the
>> user can use DefineParticle()/SetDecayMode() for defining his own.
>> - I admit I did not look yet into this. Ivana, is it better on your side
>> ? It is something simple to do but we should actually do it.
>>
>> 5. Report from Mohammad that reflections are not handled correctly via
>> G4root interface.
>> - I checked with the example provided with G4root in test directory
>> (propagation of optical photons in a water tank with bubbles - N06).
>> Reflections *are* taken into account. No example provided yet by Mohammad...
>>
>> 6. A particle may end-up outside the setup giving the error message: "No
>> physical volume found at track vertex: (107635,-190901,-638802)"
>> - I have fixed this and to my knowledge does not happen again.
>>
>> 7. "Proposed step is 0" issue in FLUKA-VMC.
>> - I have fixed this in TFluka thanks to the fact that I have got the
>> FLUKA source from Alfredo Ferrari.
>>
>> To do's:
>> Responsibles for the items not yet solved, please let me know the
>> status. For everybody: I will try to book the next meeting at the very
>> beginning of February and after every 2 months after - let me know if
>> you are happy with this. Any new items to add to the agenda are welcome.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andrei
>>
>
Received on Tue Jan 20 2009 - 12:01:17 CET