Re: Doxygen documents of examples

From: Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka.kazuyoshi_at_jaea.go.jp>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:07:47 +0900

Hi list,

From: Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka.kazuyoshi_at_jaea.go.jp> Subject: Doxygen documents of examples (Re: [VMC] modification of g4libs.C. granular/global?) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:11:48 +0900

>>> The new version (2.6) is going to be released
>>> during this week (it was waiting for the
>>> Root tag v5.23/02, in order to be synchronized
>>> with both Geant4 and Root releases).
>> 
>> I'm looking forward to it.

>
> It may be better to point out the following before
> the next release...
>
> The Doxygen documents on "The VMC examples" states
> that in "Geometry definition"
> "All VMC examples define by default geometry via
> TGeo (since Geant4 VMC version 2.0).",
> but in "Configuration Macros:" as well as in the
> doxygen document for individual example (and indeed
> in run_g4.C of all examples E[1236]) the default is
> g4Config.C.
> It may be easier to fix the "All VMC examples"
> sentence, but I guess it's better to revise all the
> examples so that the defaults will be g4Cofig.C...

Ah, I think I understand now...

There're two items, geometry DEFINITION and geometry NAVIGATION, and what is stated in the above is that for DEFINITION the default is TGeo.

And for TGeo definition _in Geant4 only_, there're two choices for NAVIGATION, Geant4 native and G4root/TGeo; among the two TGeo examples, the default is the one w/ Geant4 native navigation. (and the 'xyz' in 'xyzOld.C' stands for g4Config or g4tgeoConfg, i.e. xyzOld.C = g4ConfigOld.C or g4tgeoOldConfig.C)

Am I correct?

Kazuyoshi at work

--
Kazuyoshi Furutaka
furutaka _dot_ kazuyoshi _at_ jaea _dot_ go _dot_ jp

Received on Thu Mar 05 2009 - 06:07:59 CET