Re: Special Cuts

From: Florian Zenoni <florianzenoni_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:21:49 +0100


Dear Ivana,

I'm using physics list LHEP_EMV or CHIPS. I tried to reproduce the same code from the example E03, then I set the cuts in my DetectorConstruction.cxx at the end of
DetectorConstruction::ConstructGeometry(), right after gMC->SetRootGeometry().
Eventually, I could reproduce the error in the example E03, but until this time only with the physics list LHEP. However in the table that resumes the cuts (at the beginning of the run), they seem to be correct.
On the contrary LHEP_EMV and CHIPS, that give me the error in my simulation, run well in the example. Of course, in the same table at the beginning of my simulation, the cuts are ignored.

Thank you,
Florian

2011/2/8 Ivana Hrivnacova <Ivana.Hrivnacova_at_cern.ch>:
>
> Dear Florian,
>
> Could you, please, give more information?
> Which physics list do you use? Can you reproduce the error by modifying the
> E03 example?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ivana
>
> On 02/07/2011 04:34 PM, Florian Zenoni wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I am using Root 5.28, Geant4VMC 2.11 and Geant4.9.4.
>> I'm working on a silicon detector simulation, and I would like to
>> apply some cuts in Geant3 way, as explained here:
>> http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/special-cuts-and-regions.
>> So, in my g4tgeoConfig.C, I've added "specialCuts" as the third
>> argument of TG4RunConfiguration. Then I've set something like this:
>> gMC->Gstpar(mediumId, "CUTGAM", 10.e-06), as found in the example E03.
>>
>> Here is the error when I run my simulation:
>> "G4ProcessTable::Insert : arguments are 0 pointer".
>>
>> Has someone any idea?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> Florian
>>
>
> --
> ==============================================================
> e-mail:  Ivana.Hrivnacova_at_cern.ch
> address: Institut de Physique Nucléaire, 91406 Orsay, France
> phone:   +33 169156594
> ==============================================================
>
Received on Wed Feb 09 2011 - 09:22:14 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 09 2011 - 23:25:02 CET