Hi Sue, Splitting classes with members being a TString is supported since 3.03. You can use it without problems. In case you do not want to split a member of a class, you can use the "||" in the member comment field: class something { int a; myclass b; /|| please do not split this member } Rene Brun On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Susan Kasahara wrote: > Hi roottalk, > I have a class: > class Record : public TNamed { > ... > }; > (There are also subclasses of the Record class that contain specialized data members > according to different types of record data.) > I create a TTree with one main branch to hold objects of type Record: > Record* record = 0; > tree -> Branch("record","Record",&record,16000,99); > and the main branch is split with level = 99. This splits the data members > of the TNamed class onto 2 separate branches: fName and fTitle. > My experience with the i/o of objects of this Record class to a TTree split > in this manner is that it works and I can retrieve the data stored in fName correctly. > But while researching a problem in a new record package design, related to the storage and retrieval > of TNamed data, I came upon the following roottalk digest discussion: > http://root.cern.ch/root/roottalk/roottalk00/1216.html > which indicates that splitting the TNamed data members shouldn't work. Was I just lucky when splitting > the TNamed data members in the past, or is this splitting somehow supported with > newer versions of ROOT (I'm using cvs ROOT updated last Friday)? > If the answer is that splitting of TNamed objects is not allowed, is there a way to > tell the tree->Branch method to not split the TNamed object, while still avoiding > customizing the splitlevel for the various subclasses of class Record? > Thanks for your help, > -Sue Kasahara >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 04 2003 - 23:51:15 MET