Hello Axel,
My experience one can mix VC6 and VC7 compiled DLLs and libraries
BUT
I could not find a way to use 'NET debugger to debug the code compiled
with the code compiled by VC6 with the flag -Z7 (Very this flag was used
by ROOT Makefile). The problem is .Net can not find the source file to
provide the source-level debug information. One still can debug on the
assembler level :-((
Very likely we should change ROOT Makefile to keep the debug information
in the dedicated "PDB" files. That both Studio 6 as well as 7 should
understand things properly (I hope)
Valeri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
[mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]
> On Behalf Of Axel Naumann
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:30 AM
> To: GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA
> Cc: 'roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch'; 'Langston, Matthew David'
> Subject: Re: [ROOT] Suggestion for official release of Root under
Visual
> C++.net
>
> Hi,
>
> Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the
code
> patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary
> version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6 binaries
> work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any a
> priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd
> volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff into
> current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.)
>
> Cheers, Axel.
>
> GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote:
> > Dear members of the ROOT team,
> > I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to
install
> it
> > on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by
Matthew
> D.
> > Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for
Visual
> > C++.net?
> >
> > François-Xavier Gentit
> > DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay
> > http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET