Hi Axel, I've anyway enabled it in the cvs version. If you want to look for a work around just disable in meta/Module.mk (bottom of the file) this case. If you manage to find a fix we can remove this check. Cheers, Fons. On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 17:18, Axel Naumann wrote: > Hi, > > could you wait with that a two days, please? One might be able to patch > TStreamerInfo such that we get a workaround for the compiler bug without > degrading its performance on any platform (opt on even for .net). I'll > check over the weekend. > > Cheers, Axel. > > Fons Rademakers wrote: > > I'll try to check for the VC++ compiler level and make the rule only > > when that compiler is used (we do that already for some other > > compilers). > > > > Cheers, Fons. > > > > > > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 17:05, Nick van Eijndhoven wrote: > > > >>Hi Rene, > >>Degrading the TStreamerInfo opt level for windows in general > >>just because of bugs in the .net compiler is not a good idea > >>to my opinion. > >>I would suggest that .net users just build their own > >>root binaries and use lower opt level as long as the bugs are > >>there. Once the .net compiler is in good shape, one could think > >>of providing also the binaries for the .net compiler using the > >>standard opt level. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nick. > >> > >>Rene Brun wrote: > >> > >>>Hi Matt, > >>> > >>>Thanks for sending your changes to the Makefile. I am surprised > >>>to see so many bugs in the MS .NET compiler. > >>> > >>>I imported most of your minor changes to the Makefile for the cleanup process. > >>>I also took your changes to the Makefile.win32 and incorporated the same > >>>mods in Makefile.win32gdk. > >>> > >>>I did not take your patch for TTreeFormulaManager.h. I do not want > >>>to mess a class because of a MS compiler bug. I changed the destructor > >>>to be public instead for all cases. (a pity) > >>> > >>>I did not take your mods to degrade the optimisation level when compiling > >>>TStreamerInfo. Compiling this class with optimisation is very important. > >>>We may introduce a case for Windows in general to compile this class > >>>with no optmisation. To be discussed. > >>> > >>>Now in CVS. > >>> > >>>We do not intend to provide binaries in the short term (next few weeks) > >>>for .NET. I encourage Axel in his suggestion to see if binaries compiled > >>>under VC++6 work also in the .NET environment. > >>> > >>>Rene Brun > >>> > >>>Axel Naumann wrote: > >>> > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the code > >>>>patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary > >>>>version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6 binaries > >>>>work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any a > >>>>priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd > >>>>volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff into > >>>>current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.) > >>>> > >>>>Cheers, Axel. > >>>> > >>>>GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Dear members of the ROOT team, > >>>>> I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to install it > >>>>>on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by Matthew D. > >>>>>Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for Visual > >>>>>C++.net? > >>>>> > >>>>>François-Xavier Gentit > >>>>>DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay > >>>>>http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://root.cern.ch/~rdm/ Fax: +41 22 7679480
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET