Hi Rene,
There are TWO major corrections to be done:
1. RConfig.h should define
# define R__ANSISTREAM /* ANSI C++ Standard Library conformant */
for all Vc<x> compilers.
AND
2. test/Makefile.win32 must use
LIBS = $(ROOTLIBS) $(guilibsdll) MSVCPRT.LIB
Instead of
LIBS = $(ROOTLIBS) $(guilibsdll) MSVCIRT.LIB
THEN VC6 compiled and Vc7 compiled libraries will be compatible.
Valeri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
[mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]
> On Behalf Of Rene Brun
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:10 AM
> To: Axel Naumann
> Cc: GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA; 'roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch';
'Langston,
> Matthew David'
> Subject: Re: [ROOT] Suggestion for official release of Root under
Visual
> C++.net
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for sending your changes to the Makefile. I am surprised
> to see so many bugs in the MS .NET compiler.
>
> I imported most of your minor changes to the Makefile for the cleanup
> process.
> I also took your changes to the Makefile.win32 and incorporated the
same
> mods in Makefile.win32gdk.
>
> I did not take your patch for TTreeFormulaManager.h. I do not want
> to mess a class because of a MS compiler bug. I changed the destructor
> to be public instead for all cases. (a pity)
>
> I did not take your mods to degrade the optimisation level when
compiling
> TStreamerInfo. Compiling this class with optimisation is very
important.
> We may introduce a case for Windows in general to compile this class
> with no optmisation. To be discussed.
>
> Now in CVS.
>
> We do not intend to provide binaries in the short term (next few
weeks)
> for .NET. I encourage Axel in his suggestion to see if binaries
compiled
> under VC++6 work also in the .NET environment.
>
> Rene Brun
>
> Axel Naumann wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the
code
> > patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary
> > version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6
binaries
> > work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any
a
> > priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd
> > volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff
into
> > current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.)
> >
> > Cheers, Axel.
> >
> > GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote:
> > > Dear members of the ROOT team,
> > > I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to
> install it
> > > on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by
> Matthew D.
> > > Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for
Visual
> > > C++.net?
> > >
> > > François-Xavier Gentit
> > > DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay
> > > http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET