Hi Valeri, NO, this does not work. I have spend all day playing with these options. Activating R__ANSISTREAM with VC++6 has plenty of side effects. For example with TDatime.h and TTime.h (all MS bugs!!). I also played with MSVCPRT.LIB instead of MSVCIRT.LIB for VC++6. It does not work. We are very busy now preparing lectures for next week. I do not want to hear about MS again until end of next week. Rene Brun "Faine, Valeri" wrote: > > Hi Rene, > > There are TWO major corrections to be done: > > 1. RConfig.h should define > # define R__ANSISTREAM /* ANSI C++ Standard Library conformant */ > for all Vc<x> compilers. > > AND > > 2. test/Makefile.win32 must use > > LIBS = $(ROOTLIBS) $(guilibsdll) MSVCPRT.LIB > Instead of > LIBS = $(ROOTLIBS) $(guilibsdll) MSVCIRT.LIB > > THEN VC6 compiled and Vc7 compiled libraries will be compatible. > > Valeri > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > [mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch] > > On Behalf Of Rene Brun > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:10 AM > > To: Axel Naumann > > Cc: GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA; 'roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch'; > 'Langston, > > Matthew David' > > Subject: Re: [ROOT] Suggestion for official release of Root under > Visual > > C++.net > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > Thanks for sending your changes to the Makefile. I am surprised > > to see so many bugs in the MS .NET compiler. > > > > I imported most of your minor changes to the Makefile for the cleanup > > process. > > I also took your changes to the Makefile.win32 and incorporated the > same > > mods in Makefile.win32gdk. > > > > I did not take your patch for TTreeFormulaManager.h. I do not want > > to mess a class because of a MS compiler bug. I changed the destructor > > to be public instead for all cases. (a pity) > > > > I did not take your mods to degrade the optimisation level when > compiling > > TStreamerInfo. Compiling this class with optimisation is very > important. > > We may introduce a case for Windows in general to compile this class > > with no optmisation. To be discussed. > > > > Now in CVS. > > > > We do not intend to provide binaries in the short term (next few > weeks) > > for .NET. I encourage Axel in his suggestion to see if binaries > compiled > > under VC++6 work also in the .NET environment. > > > > Rene Brun > > > > Axel Naumann wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the > code > > > patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary > > > version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6 > binaries > > > work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any > a > > > priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd > > > volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff > into > > > current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.) > > > > > > Cheers, Axel. > > > > > > GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote: > > > > Dear members of the ROOT team, > > > > I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to > > install it > > > > on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by > > Matthew D. > > > > Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for > Visual > > > > C++.net? > > > > > > > > François-Xavier Gentit > > > > DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay > > > > http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/ > > > > > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET