Dear Rene Brun I have several shared libs which I am loading from rootlogon.C and to reproduce the problem one need all this libs. Bellow you can find few lines making CINT crash ******************************************* * * * W E L C O M E to R O O T * * * * Version 4.00/08 9 July 2004 * * * * You are welcome to visit our Web site * * http://root.cern.ch * * * ******************************************* FreeType Engine v2.1.3 used to render TrueType fonts. Compiled for linux with thread support. CINT/ROOT C/C++ Interpreter version 5.15.138, May 23 2004 Type ? for help. Commands must be C++ statements. Enclose multiple statements between { }. Welcome to ROOT Loading Int2TString_cpp.so ... succeed Loading FindMaximum_cpp.so ... succeed Loading TCell_cpp.so ... succeed Loading TileInfo_cpp.so ... succeed Loading TileFile_cpp.so ... succeed Loading Tile23_cpp.so ... succeed Loading Tile02_cpp.so ... succeed Loading Tile03_cpp.so ... succeed Loading Tile04_cpp.so ... succeed Loading TileEnergy_cpp.so ... succeed root [0] TileInfo info(2100033) root [1] Tile04 tile(info.GetTree()) root [2] gROOT->Reset() root [3] .q This is the end of ROOT -- Goodbye *** Break *** segmentation violation Generating stack trace... I would like to know why CINT crashes after .q when gROOT->Reset() was passed without problems. Thanks, Margar Simonyan On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Rene Brun wrote: > I cannot tell you what is going wrong without knowing what you are doing. > I need the shortest possible running script reproducing your problem. > Note that gROOT->Reset should only be used inside an unnamed macro. > > Rene brun > > Margar SIMONYAN wrote: > > > > Dear Rene Brun > > > > sorry I forgot to mention, I am using ROOT 4.00/08. > > Unfortunately I can't send you short file reproducing the problem, but > > base class destructor does nothing, so in case of Tile04 there should not > > be double delete problem. I verified that all pointers are not 0 before > > delete in ~Tile04() . Sometimes CINT crashes after gROOT->Reset(), > > sometimes after .q . Even commenting all delete operators in the > > destructor of Tile04 doesn't help. > > I know that without looking inside code it is hard to find a bug, but > > could you say what can make CINT crash ? > > > > Best regards, > > Margar > > > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Rene Brun wrote: > > > > > This looks like a typical double delete problem. > > > Could you send the shortest possible running file or set of files > > > reproducing the problem? > > > Since you do not indicate which version of ROOT you are using, I assume > > > that you use 4.00/08 or newer. > > > If you use an older version, please try first with a more recent version. > > > > > > Rene Brun > > > > > > On Tue, > > > 5 Oct 2004, Margar > > > SIMONYAN wrote: > > > > > > > Dear users of ROOT > > > > > > > > I have several classes which I am compiling from CINT and loading the > > > > shared libraries from rootlogon.C The class dependency is the following > > > > > > > > class TileFile{ ... //abstract base class} > > > > class Tile23 :public TileFile {...} > > > > class Tile02 :public Tile23{...} > > > > class Tile03 :public Tile23{...} > > > > class Tile04 :public TileFile{...} > > > > class TileInfo {...//some useful thinks} > > > > class TileAlg { TileFile * t; //polymorphic > > > > TileInfo i; ...} > > > > > > > > If I change something local in Tile04 then is it necessary to re-compile > > > > and re-load TileFile and TileAlg ? > > > > In Tile04 I am adding friend to fChain using TTree::AddFriend(). > > > > All classes in the hierarchy have virtual destructors with the > > > > following implementation (Tile23, Tile02, Tile03, Tile04) > > > > > > > > if (!fChain) return; > > > > delete fChain->GetCurrentFile(); > > > > > > > > but Tile04::~Tile04() makes CINT crash. I suppose it depends on > > > > TTree::AddFriend(), any idea ? > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Margar > > > > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:09 MET