TFraction Fitter extension

From: Arthur E. Snyder <snyder_at_slac.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:11:57 -0700 (PDT)


Whoops forgot to change the title so I'm reposting this note with a more sensible subject heading.

BTW, If anybody more familiar with the workings of ROOT is interested I would love to have a collaborator on this extension. Once it's running and tested I think it would be worth publishing a short note on some appropriat journal.

-Art S.

A.E. Snyder, Group EC                        \!c*p?/
SLAC Mail Stop #95                          ((.   .))
Box 4349                                        |
Stanford, Ca, USA, 94309                      '\|/`
e-mail:snyder_at_slac.stanford.edu                 o
phone:650-926-2701                              _
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~snyder          BaBar
FAX:650-926-2657                          Collaboration



On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Arthur E. Snyder wrote:

>
> I've written an extention to the TFraction fitter that will allow a fit
> to parameterized weights to be made, thus allowing a binned likelihood
> fit to be made for parameters with weighted MC as the source of the
> underlying "PDF".
>
> However, I can't figure out how to compile .cxx files. I've checked to
> ROOT from cvs, modified TFractionFitter.cxx and .hh and written a new
> class TBinWeighter (which is a TNamed object, so I can put it in list),
> but when I try to compile it in my usual ROOT enviroment I get a lot
> of complaints about undefined TDate::operator= and such. It looks like
> there's some kind of pre-processor that will add some machine dependent
> functions to my .cxx to produce a .cc that can be compiled. Is that right?
> How do I do it?
>
> -Art S.
>
>
> A.E. Snyder, Group EC \!c*p?/
> SLAC Mail Stop #95 ((. .))
> Box 4349 |
> Stanford, Ca, USA, 94309 '\|/`
> e-mail:snyder_at_slac.stanford.edu o
> phone:650-926-2701 _
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~snyder BaBar
> FAX:650-926-2657 Collaboration
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Jul 27 2005 - 02:12:04 MEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 14:45:11 MET