regarding libgfortran.so and libgfortranbegin.a

From: Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:32:25 -0800


Hi Dmitry and others,

On Nov 5, 2007 1:59 PM, <naumov_at_nusun.jinr.ru> wrote:

> your suggestion about adding -L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2 to the
> compilation line worked! Thanks a lot for so quick reply!
>
> Yes I had already gfortran-4.2 installed. There were one more strange
> thing. By default (seems) root is linking lgfortran.so while as I have
> gfortran-4.2 there is no lgfortran.so but libgfortran.so.2.0.0. I manualy
> set up a symbolic link
> ln -s libgfortran.so.2.0.0 lgfortran.so
> to make root compiling. It would be great however if root will detect such
> things automatically.

I've just filed a bug report in the Debian BTS about the absence of the libgfortran.so symlink and the libgfortranbegin.a static lib from /usr/lib/. Interested parties can follow it at:

http://bugs.debian.org/449433

to see what the Debian gfortran maintainers eventually decide.

best regards,

-- 
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty_at_princeton.edu>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/    Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751                 Princeton, NJ 08544
Received on Mon Nov 05 2007 - 20:32:42 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:50:02 CET