Re: fixed bin width

From: Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco_at_cern.ch>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:15:51 +0300


Àstrid Morreale wrote:
> you could use a tree instead of a Histogram, I think I tree is more flexible in that regard.
Very true ... this was my first thought and intention .. but i just wanted to ask about this ... it would simplify some quick things that sometime one have to do ...
Thanks,
Best regards,
Adrian

> Adrian Sevcenco ha scritto
> <°> John wrote:
> <°>> I don't understand your question yet ... when you define a histogram,
> <°>> you have a fixed number of bins already. When you say " ... keep
> <°>> scaling the axis range automatically as it is filled ... " you mean the
> <°>> y axis ?
> <°>>
> <°>> regards,
> <°>>
> <°>> John Idarraga
> <°>> UMontreal
> <°> Well ... my wish is just to define a histogram with lets say 1 bin with
> <°> the bin width = 1 ... and if i fill with, lets say 15, automatically the
> <°> histogram will resize to have 16 bins with range extended up to value 16...
> <°> well... if its too far fetched i will just cope with what i have ...
> <°> Best regards,
> <°> Adrian
> <°>
> <°>> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> <°>>> Hi,
> <°>>> Is there a possibility of setting up a histogram with a fixed bin width
> <°>>> that will keep scaling the axis range automatically as it is filled?
> <°>>> Thank you,
> <°>>> Best regards,
> <°>>> Adrian
> <°>>>
> <°>>>
> <°>>
> <°>
>
>
> -Àstrid
>
> ===============================================
> http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~astrid/
> ================================================
> Àstrid Morreale
> University Of California_at_Riverside
> PHENIX SPIN Physics Group
> http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/physics/spin/
> E-mail: astrid_at_bnl.gov |Tel(BNL):631-344-7266
> |Fax(BNL):631-344-3253
> A_A
> (-.-)
> |-|
> / \
> | | __
> | || | | \_/
> \_||_/_/
> ¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.><((((º>
> ===============================================
> Vidi ch'un s'affaccia quacchi fungi!!!!!

Received on Tue Jul 08 2008 - 16:16:16 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 08 2008 - 17:50:02 CEST