Hi, I would agree with Nick not to change the specification of the constructor (except if all TChain users agree with it...), but rather to add a new member function. Or, is it a stupid idea to construct automatically a chain name from the tree name, keeping the same constructor TChain(const char* treename) ? Something like TChainOf_treename or so ? -- APHECETCHE Laurent (mailto:aphecetche@ganil.fr) GANIL, B.P. 5027, 14076, Caen Cedex 5, France Vox: +33 (0)2 31 45 45 85 - Fax: +33 (0)2 31 45 46 65 WWW: http://ganp03.in2p3.fr/nof/ & (perso.) http://www.mygale.org/~p0mp0n
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:34:32 MET