Laurent Aphecetche wrote: > > Hi, > > I would agree with Nick not to change the specification of the > constructor (except if > all TChain users agree with it...), but rather to add a new member > function. Or, > is it a stupid idea to construct automatically a chain name from the > tree name, keeping > the same constructor TChain(const char* treename) ? Something like > TChainOf_treename or so ? > OK, since my proposed change would have affected more people than I thought, I propose to implement the two constructors: TChain(const char *treename) TChain(const char *chainname, const char *treename, const char *title="") Rene Brun
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:34:32 MET