Re: SpecFuncMath*M*ore.h

And all the external packages needed, especially for ubuntu, can be found here:

http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/build-prerequisites

Cheers, Fons.

On 30 Mar 2010, at 10:08, Axel Naumann <Axel.Naumann_at_cern.ch> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> configure would have installed MathMore, but MathMore needs libgsl
> (and it told you in its output :-). Just do sudo apt-get install
> libgsl0-dev and re-configure and re-build:
> ./build/unix/reconfigure.sh
> make -j2
>
> Cheers, Axel.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-roottalk_at_root.cern.ch on behalf of Cedric Sodhi
> Sent: Tue 3/30/2010 9:48 AM
> To: zimmerst_at_gmail.com
> Cc: roottalk_at_root.cern.ch
> Subject: Re: [ROOT] SpecFuncMath*M*ore.h
>
> No I didnt. Thanks. It appears that I had underestimaged ./configure
> by
> a bit. Looks like a track full of trouble ahead if I really have to
> figure it out in such detail.
>
> I will search for the default ubuntu config now, so I can use it with
> ./configure (assuming that major componentents such as mathmore are
> included). If anyone readily knows what it is/where I can look it up
> I'd
> greaty appreciate the input.
>
> Thanks. --CS
>
>
> Stephan Zimmer wrote:
> > Hi, did you activate "mathmore" i.e. specify --with-math-more (or
> look
> > it up using ./configure --help?
> > Cheers, Stephan
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 09:31 +0200, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> >> I am having a hard time getting this to run here. I updated from
> v18 in
> >> my repos to v26 from source because I thought this would solve
> quite a
> >> bunch of issues I encountered when trying to run a set of
> routines which
> >> were meant to work.
> >>
> >> If you are interested in trying this out you can find them packed
> here:
> >> http://accms04.physik.rwth-aachen.de/~praktapp/ -> "Neue ROOT
> Routinen"
> >> Direct link for download:
> >> http://accms04.physik.rwth-aachen.de/~praktapp/root_new/
> >> Author(s) as mentioned on page.
> >>
> >> When I last tried with v18 I was quickly stopped by bugs because
> (see
> >> original thread at the end of this email) there were wrong
> directories
> >> in more than one header file, referencing /usr/lib rather than
> >> /usr/lib/root. I fixed that manually but then I ran into
> >>
> >> Error: cannot open file "Math/SpecFuncMathMore.h"
> >> /home/manday/Programs/lib/raupach/praktlib.h:38:
> >>
> >> which I accounted to my outdated version (although said routines
> >> originate already some time back).
> >>
> >> Unfortunally, even after updating to v26 (version confirmed on
> startup)
> >> I keep getting the same error. Aforementioned file doesn't even
> appear
> >> to exist in roots include directory while a similar one named
> >> "SpecFuncMath*C*ore.h" does. I'm clueless.
> >>
> >> --CS
> >>
> >>
> >> Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> >>> As for that original issue, it's still occuring even after I
> updated:
> >>>
> >>> Error: cannot open file "../lib/libMathCore.so"
> >>> /usr/include/root/Math/SpecFuncMathCore.h:32:
> >>> *** Interpreter error recovered ***
> >>>
> >>> Can anyone confirm this so I can file a bug?
> >>>
> >>> Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> >>>> Hello, after experiencing just the same error
> >>>>
> >>>> (German:) http://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=118970
> >>>>
> >>>> I wondered how readily ROOT gets updates in the variety of
> >>>> repositories of Linux distributions. I know perfectly well that
> the
> >>>> first source for getting just about any program should be the
> vendor
> >>>> of the program ittself, but I also pretty much appreciate the
> >>>> convenience of dedicated repositories and trouble-free
> installation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there anyone at CERN who monitors regular updates in the
> >>>> repositories (Ubuntu, it is for me)? Is there any reason for me
> to
> >>>> hope that it will get an appropriate update anytime soon?
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 30 2010 - 10:49:08 CEST